Mortgage Article


  • The real estate industry is abuzz with the recent final approval of the National Association of Realtors' (NAR) $418 million settlement. This settlement, which was preliminarily approved in April 2024, marks a significant shift in how real estate commissions are handled.

    Background and Settlement Details

    The settlement stems from a lawsuit brought by home sellers who alleged that NAR's commission rules were anticompetitive. The plaintiffs argued that these rules forced home sellers to pay inflated commissions to buyer's agents. In response, NAR agreed to pay $418 million and implement several changes to its business practices.

    One of the key changes is the removal of offers of compensation from multiple listing services (MLS). Additionally, agents are now required to secure signed agreements from buyers before showing homes. This change aims to increase transparency and ensure that buyers are aware of their financial responsibilities.

    Department of Justice's Concerns

    Despite the settlement's approval, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has raised concerns about certain provisions. The DOJ believes that the requirement for buyers to sign agreements before home tours could limit competition among brokers. They argue that this provision may harm buyers and restrict how brokers compete for clients.

    Industry Reactions

    The real estate industry has had mixed reactions to the settlement. Some believe that the changes will lead to more transparent and fair practices, benefiting both buyers and sellers. Others are concerned about the potential impact on commission rates and the overall business model of real estate agents.

    Looking Ahead

    As the industry adjusts to these new rules, it remains to be seen how they will affect the market in the long term. NAR President Kevin Sears has emphasized that the settlement empowers real estate professionals and consumers to negotiate services and compensation that work for them. However, the DOJ's ongoing investigation and potential future litigation could mean that this issue is far from being settled.